It has been nearly a year since the official release of Windows 11, and a few days ago, Microsoft has pushed the first major version update containing many functional updates. Although the new version introduces functions such as labeling the file manager based on user requirements, many users using Win10 still have concerns about Win11. Recently, a comparative test result of Neowin, a foreign technology media, seems to confirm that users' concerns are not unnecessary.
Windows正式发布已经将近一年了。最近，微软推出了第一个大版本更新，包括许多功能更新。虽然新版本根据用户需求引入了标签等功能，但它们被广泛使用Win10的用户对于Win11还是有些顾忌。近日，国外科技媒体Neowin对比测试结果，似乎证实了用户的担忧并非多余。
Recently, in order to explore many users' doubts about Win11's endurance performance, Neowin conducted a comparative test. The media installed four Windows systems on the same test equipment, namely Windows 11 21H2 (original release), Windows 11 2022 Update (version 22H2), Windows 11 Dev (build 25201), and Windows 10 (version 21H2). The system was installed on four different partitions, and then loaded PCMark10 Extended three times, Until the power is turned off automatically from 100%. Finally, count the standby time of different systems.
最近，为了探索很多用户，对于Win疑问11续航性能，Neowin在相同的测试设备上安装了一个比较测试Windows1121H2(originalrelease)，Windows112022Update(version22H2)，Windows11Dev(build25201)，Windows10(version21H2)这4款Windows将系统安装在四个不同的区域，然后循环加载PCMark10Extended三次，直到电源从100%到自动关机。最后统计不同系统下的待机时间。
To ensure the fairness of the test, the media logged in to its Microsoft account and installed the latest driver applicable to each version during the test, and no additional third-party software was installed each time. The final test results show that under the PCMark10 Extended test, the running time of the machine with three Win11 systems installed ranges from 2 hours and 54 minutes to 3 hours and 3 minutes, while the score of running Win10 is 3 hours and 12 minutes. Although it is only 10 minutes more, it also reflects that Win10 performs better in energy consumption control.
为了确保测试的公平性，媒体在测试期间登录其Microsoft每个版本的最新驱动程序都安装在账户中，每次安装都没有额外的第三方软件。最终测试结果显示，在PCMark10Extended在测试之下，机器安装了三个模型win11系统下的运行时间从2小时54分到3小时3分钟不等，而在运行中win10小时的成绩是3小时12分，虽然只有10分钟，但也反映了win在能耗控制方面表现更好。
This performance is more obvious when playing YouTube videos. The endurance of the same laptop running 1080p YouTube video in Microsoft Edge under the Win11 system is between 4 hours and 50 minutes to 4 hours and 55 minutes respectively, while under the Win10 system, its performance is 5 hours and 24 minutes, nearly half an hour more.
这种表现在播放中YouTube视频更明显。同样的笔记本电脑在win11系统下，使用微软自带的MicrosoftEdge中运行1080pYouTube视频的续航性能分别在4小时50到4小时55分之间，而在win10分，成绩为5小时24分，多了将近半个小时。
Of course, this test is more close to the comparison of actual use, which does not fully explain that Win11 is inferior to Win10 in terms of endurance, but even so, the data obtained has a certain practical reference significance.
当然，这个测试更接近实际使用的对比，并不能完全解释Win11在耐力方面不如win10、但即便如此，所获得的数据也具有一定的实际参考意义。